Over the last few weeks some pretty bright minds have been talking / writing about what Information Governance (IG) is and isn’t
There’s even an entire day (third Thursday in February) dedicated to information governance. Yes, information governance has gotten so popular that it has its own holiday
We have imposed artificial risks and conflicts, by distinguishing between "sturctured" and "unstructured" governance. These are technology driven distinctions and should not be affecting business policy on information management
Information governance touches the whole of the organisation...You cannot solve the Information Governance problem by throwing technology at it...Information Governance should be unified and consistent
They were neither aware nor did they ever practice governance...The frauds mandated good governance to keep them in check...As such, the call for strong information governance is even more necessary
This previous post was about the need for holism in information governance. This post brings up topics that you’ll have to deal with in defining holistic information governance. (I think I’ll refer to these as PHIG s - Principles of Holistic Information Governance)
Boosted by information technology We already wrote in a note published recently: The information is born of contextualization and interpretation of data
I was recently discussing with a friend the steps to implement an information governance program. Unfortunately creating an information governance program is not a cut and dry formulaic process. Information governance is not just about records, but it is about information and the relationship between information and ROI
To some, information governance (IG) is a mushy term that isn't quite real
People are always asking "Where should I start with my SharePoint governance planning?