That concludes the description of the model. โInformationโ Now, to bring it all together, let me tie this discussion of โGovernanceโ into the broader discussion (or is it the narrower discussion?)
1 Comment - First, let me say I've enjoyed reading this discussion on a "Simple Model for Information Governance"
George Socha and Tom Gelbmann, building on the success of their E-discovery Reference Model (the EDRM), have created the Information Governance Reference Model...See OCEGโs โGRC Capability Model โRed Bookโ 2.0.โ
4 Comments - We did our best to make the definitions, concepts and principles clear, and to provide a roadmap for implementation, with special focus on the 5 key areas of impact based on the Information Governance Reference Model (legal, RIM, IT, Privacy & security, and business)
Creating "chargeback" models is difficult, and not everyone agrees that SharePoint should even have one or be managed that way. Successful models include some kind of end user training or certification, reducing support and governance overhead
I suspect that a large part of the issue is that classification models are too granular and too tightly coupled to the retention schedule
1 Comment - no search term matches found in comments.
If you look back even 18 to 24 months in the past, the focus was to classify every artifact within our enterprise platform using detailed metadata, structured taxonomies and content types, and expansive architectures and topologies that would allow us more powerful and flexible search options -- all in an effort to identify content and expertise hidden within our rapidly growing content stores. That model has been turned on its head
3 Comments - no search term matches found in comments.
Each of these four components has requirements from the organization that influence the overall governance model . One key thing that all the authors establishes is that no two organizations governance models are the same. All the experts agree that the people involved in the governance model, that form a governance committee , should include not only representatives of the IT department but also representatives of the organization
People understand that we are still relatively early in the cloud model, and that things will continue to improve
In my experience, one mistake is forcing a heavy governance model onto SharePoint as a quick-fix, especially if its outside of the way you already do business. Many organizations (well, the managers and administrators within those orgs) love the idea of adopting a formal, structured model for managing SharePoint. Using the hammer of governance, everything looks like a nail. But the model you follow needs to match the culture of the teams within, otherwise you run the danger of killing organic growth, and limiting the overall success of your SharePoint platform
Make no mistake, these scandals were the result of information lifecycle management policies based in part or entirely on the DoD 5015.2 model of enterprise records management
These differences really have nothing to do with the core principles that make your governance model successful: Understand your current system: how it works, how it is managed, strengths and weaknesses
8403 Colesville Rd #1100Silver Spring, MD 20910USA
Phone: (301) 587-8202Toll free: (800) 477-2446Email: hello@aiim.org
JoinBenefitsLearn More
About UsTerms of Use