Last night, while flying home from the Enterprise 2.0 Conference - Santa Clara, I thought about all of the sessions I attended, the people I spoke with, the demos I watched, and I kept thinking back to something that Dawn Lacallade said in her presentation on Wednesday afternoon:
"If you want your Enterprise 2.0 efforts to be successful, you have to use words other people understand and care about."
She went on to say that instead of talking about social media, social business, building communities and why your organization needs to use blogs, wikis, and microblogging, you should be talking about increasing sales, increasing productivity, and cutting costs. If you're talking with Director of HR, he doesn't care that you are managing 100 new communities or that 1,000 Yammer messages were posted today. He wants to know if the attrition rates are going down or that new employees are getting acclimated more quickly. For you, building communities might be the goal. For him, those communities don't mean anything unless they can help him reach his goals.
Paradoxically, sometimes the best way to implement social tools are to not refer to them as social tools. This isn't a new concept - do a Google search for social media leadership buy-in and you'll come across thousands of articles and case studies all saying some variation of, "focus on the business objectives, not the tools."
For Enterprise 2.0 to be successful, we have to take it much further. This about much more than what words to use. It's about integrating the use of Enterprise 2.0 tools into the actual business. It's about realizing that these tools are a means to an end, not the end itself. It's about understanding that a social business community that isn't tied to actual business goals isn't sustainable.
In this article, Chris Rasmussen explains how five years after the launch of Intellipedia, there's still a long way to go to integrate it into the way the Intelligence Community does its work.
The United States Intelligence Community (IC) has made tremendous strides over the last several years with the introduction of a wide range of social software tools such as wikis, blogs, user tagging services, and social networking services for knowledge management and information sharing. Looking back over the last five years there’s little question that “information sharing” has increased across the board and the Web 2.0 tools mentioned above have helped with this moderate cultural shift. We have successfully automated the digital watercooler, created a massive unofficial knowledge base, and improved search by increasing the amount of links, but is this it? Are process gains in informal channels the optimized promise of Web 2.0 at work? What about the official channels? Content exchange is the lowest rung of the collaborative ladder when compared to joint knowledge co-creation in official channels and this has not happened within the IC.
This is where the Enterprise 2.0 industry finds itself today.You've brought social tools to your Intranet? You've created a dozen active, vibrant communities behind your firewall? That's great, but don't go patting yourself on the back too much. Now, let's drive it deeper into the business. If your goal this year was to bring Enterprise 2.0 to your organization, your goal for next year should be to integrate those tools into one or more of your business units. If you spoke at the this year's Enterprise 2.0 Conference and talked about community management or your implementation of SharePoint, Newsgator, Yammer, Socialcast, Clearvale or any of the other platforms, next year, I want you to bring a leader from another part of your business who can talk about how he's used the platforms and the communities to have a tangible impact on his business.
Becoming a Social Business isn't enough - you also have to become a better business.#SocialBusiness #E20 #e2conf #socialmedia #conference #santaclara #internal #techweb #Yammer #SocBiz #enterprise2.0 #enterprise