utm campaign=MI.Building%20an%20Effective%20Strategy%20for%20Content%20Integration%20and%20Migration.IW&utm content=93316938&utm medium=social&utm source=twitter&hss channel=tw-119468133
However, the fact that the social software vendors and the ECM vendors meet yet again at the Enterprise 2.0 Show makes me wonder about an interesting question: Is content management a feature of collaboration or is collaboration a feature of content management? While this may sound like the chicken or egg question, there is a fundamental difference in what the answer means
Is it really the phone that is smart or is it the user who masters the capabilities of this device?
So far, there has been only one "announcement" from the DLM Forum about this(see http://tinyurl.com/VagueMoReq2010News ), and that concentrates on thanking consultees and explaining what has happened rather than future plans or status. The date it gives for publication of a plan has passed
Many of the issues related to Infobesity (or the unnecessary storage of data that carries no operational value -- and, worse, that carries significant risk) have arisen from the failure of these groups to communicate effectively about the long-term ramifications of maintaining the status quo
If your future marketing collateral includes phrases like: “ includes dozens of views ” or “ supports complex search patterns ” or “ makes full use of SharePoint’s advanced features ” you may be heading in the wrong direction. You want to be building something that will allow you to use phrases like: “ intuitive interface ” and “ simple but effective design ” or “ a wonderful user experience &rdquo
With the proper implementation of SharePoint content types and an information lifecycle that is provisioned on an enterprise basis, all that users need to do is select a content type and then either a user or an application needs to declare a piece of content “final” at the right point in the lifecycle
Which is … A place to play and test … then reset or restart at any point
There are benefits of centralizing your scanning in Scanning Hubs or Centers with dedicated staff and advanced capture software, but there are also benefits of going for distributed scanning by users using MFPs or scanning stations. Our capture research from last year identifying the most common benefits and issues with centralized, distributed and outsourced capture; Below are some questions to help you identify the best solution for you; Location of paper documents Necessary access to files during conversion Necessary document preparation Necessary quality control Necessary metadata or data extraction Necessary security Etc How do you determine the best solution?
In short, apps like Montage make curating content on the web dead simple - either for your own consumption or sharing with others