When establishing an ECM environment, one of the key considerations is organizational behaviours. How the organization will function
Enterprise 2.0 tools (like blogs or wikis) by themselves do not make an organization social. And I suggested we need to become a social organization across our value chains if we indeed wish to understand our social customer. In this post, I will explore what this social organization looks like
We can "like" articles, comments, products, people, and organizations we are interested in...Sure we have seen many organizations invest externally in social media marketing – a Facebook page or Twitter account or recruiting through LinkedIn
Or are the real obstacles your enterprise IT department’s inability to quickly respond to business demands and the inertia of large organizations to change culture?...The politics and organizational issues continue
The authors of the whitepaper discuss the organizational impact of increasing numbers of downloads and the corresponding increase in content ratings: The parallel growth of downloads and ratings means that the learners are doing more than simply consuming knowledge; they are actively engaging in the knowledge publication process by rating a SME’s (subject matter expert’s) knowledge and ability to convey that knowledge to the community at large. When your organization has only a transactional knowledge sharing model, consumption of the content is the end state
It's an honor to be the one sharing the following announcement: The last Organizational Chart on Planet Earth was found lifeless in a trash can of a moribund corner office
Can any organization, regardless of their business vertical, benefit from the adoption of social technologies?
Dan Keldsen said it best and I’ve quoted him before: " a lot of organizations don’t think they need to improve collaboration because work still gets done, it just doesn’t get done very well."
What collaboration technology is used within your organisation? It's highly unlikely that you will be able to answer this question with just one word. "Collaboration" means so many different things to different people, and as a result most of us use several - or even many -...
2 Comments - I would still believe that an organization though has to have at least a standard, something that we can say it is our standard if other department comes up with something different try and understand it maybe integrate it to our standard. I think the big failure for most organization is that there is no standard so anything goes which then results in everyone not really buying in in whatever you are bringing on. So for me I would say as an organization, standardize to one or two tools but then allow innovation where people can come up with something new and look at integrating that to your standard tools
Why do consumer applications feel so much cooler than those in our organizations? Why is it - as Tony Zingale from Jive recently said - that we know more about what our high school girlfriend had for dinner than what is going on within our organization?
8403 Colesville Rd #1100Silver Spring, MD 20910USA
Phone: (301) 587-8202Toll free: (800) 477-2446Email: hello@aiim.org
JoinBenefitsLearn More
About UsTerms of Use